bishnu@blog

I guess those non-Nepali speakers certainly felt uneasy seeing my feeling in devnagari script. I thought, am not doing justice myself. The Nepali version all about my 5-minutes speech in Constituent Assembly. Subject was comment on Government Policy and programme.

My speech was supportive however bit in critical line. I was exhibiting my double face… supporting policies as per my Party line, which is second largest group in rulling coalition. I was definitely critical that the programme and policy was not looks like a programme presented by a Communist dominated rulling group. Some of the left intelectuals even attacked— it is in line of neo-liberal ideology!

I had touched upon basically labour sector followed by education and health. My point was why new government is still tilting too much towards Capital? Working class ofcourse expect labour biased State… but I was advocating – let make our Class-State atleast “neutral”. Nepal’s politics is swing between identity vs ideology. I was trying to communicate- well in order to address social oppression let talk gender, caste/ethnicity and regional marginalisation. However, every labour seek clear answer that how the communist parties do balance between class (ideology) + identity (gender, ethnicity, geographical region)?

Thus, I aske PM Dahal aka Prachand- what was his proposal to balance present imbalemnce between capital and labour? I was arguing- “Poverty and Labour is twin in Nepali contest. Those who are laboureres, inmost cases they are poor. Poveryty is most inhuman devil face of our soicety. None of the poor will wait without reason in empty stomach for future economic prosperity. Thus, our society is a class society. Class division doenot has any colour, caste/ethnicity, gender, religion, and regions. It has but one dimension- extreme exploitation by strogest class over the weakest class.”

So seek explanation- Rt. honorable Primeminister could you please cleqar us what proposal do you have in order to balance present imblance behaviour between labour and capital.

Rt. Honorable PM sigtly skip by saying some of the honorable CA member has raised theoritical question!